Culture sector jobs massacre – Demand Government handouts save lowest paid

Support Tate workers ballot and protest
Many hundreds of jobs are being cut in arts and heritage despite the recent announcement of a £1.57 billion rescue package.
Secretary of State Oliver Dowden said grants and loans would aim to preserve “crown jewels” in the arts sector but that hasn’t stopped redundancies and pension cuts for those who work with the crown jewels in the Tower of London.
Hundreds of the lowest paid often BAME staff have also been told their jobs are going in other major institutions including Tate, Southbank Centre, National Gallery, Historic Royal Palaces and the Royal Household. PCS are demanding the bail out money should be used to protect these lowest paid jobs.
Members at Tate galleries are leading the way and are balloting for strike action after an
indicative vote of 93% for strike on a 99% turnout. They have a day of action on 27 July when the galleries reopen with a socially distanced protest outside Tate Modern.
https://www.facebook.com/events/586493985381551
Watch this space for protests elsewhere too.
Please send messages of support to CultureSector@pcs.org.uk

News from the NEC

The Left Unity led NEC met on 8th July to discuss a number of key issues currently facing PCS.
This was one of a series of fortnightly meetings held by Zoom since lockdown began. This report provides an overview but if you would like more information about any of the issues covered, you are encouraged to contact any Left Unity NEC member, who will be able to provide more detail.
 
Coronavirus Crisis still the Biggest issue 
The Coronavirus Crisis remains the biggest issue facing members right now, serious activists understand this, and the efforts of all group and national negotiators have been rightly focused on keeping our members safe, and returning to work only when it is safe to do so. Our PCS 5 tests are being used as a basis to develop robust strategies for safe working at branch and group level.
 

The Left Unity-led NEC have made a number of gains in talks with the Cabinet Office, and these have been publicised to group negotiators, and in areas where we believe that there is still more to achieve, we have highlighted to groups where they are urged to push for better and further gains. HMRC Group’s LU leadership secured a Departmental agreement to protect members safety having had some terrible member fatalities from the virus.

BAME issues have been an important part of these discussions and a series of meetings with the Cabinet Office have taken place to discuss the COVID-19 impact on BAME groups.
PCS are pushing for more, and better, data, with priority given to early positive actions, bearing in mind the danger of a second wave of the virus.
 
We received the welcome news that LU negotiators in DWP group have negotiated a BAME-specific risk assessment, the first of its kind, which can be used to gain improvements elsewhere within PCS. HMRC have also now agreed to rollout mandatory anti-racism training for all staff, following strong representations from our PCS representatives.
 
Whilst the Cabinet Office maintain that their position remains that workers should stay at home, and stay safe, there are moves to return members, in both DFT, where the employer wants to reintroduce driving tests and DWP, where they seek to reopen jobcentres and reintroduce conditionality and sanctions, both of which cause concern for the safety of our members and the public.
 
Groups really come to the fore during the crisis
Group negotiators have done a fantastic job, working around the clock, alongside full-time officers, to provide help and support to affected members, negotiating tirelessly with the employer, and working closely with branches to get proper safety measures in place. Local health and safety reps have really come to the fore, holding management to account and ensuring adequate PPE and full risk assessments are in place before signing off agreements to get members back into work.   
We are getting numerous reports of reps challenging poor practice and refusing to reopen workplaces without full risk assessments and proper PPE. 
 
Building the Union
The importance of being a union member has really been spelled out during this period and membership has taken an upturn, with many groups seeing a net rise in membership during the first 6 months of 2020.
8938 new members have joined PCS during the first 6 months of 2020 and we are seeing many new volunteers get involved in PCS through our call hub work, with more than 2000 Advocates registered.
This increased activism is one of the benefits of our work during the crisis and with departments like DWP promising in excess of 13,500 additional staff, with 4,500 expected by October, our work around recruitment and induction is really high profile. 
Bargaining and Campaigning successes during the crisis, alongside increased activism at branch level, with several departments launching staff recruitment exercises, give us the opportunity, alongside the launch of the National Campaign, to conduct focused recruitment activity and raise the profile of PCS in every workplace.
 
Whilst our opponents in the Socialist Party-led Broad Left Network (BLN) make cheap political attacks, despite presiding over areas with membership density of less than 20%, Left Unity recognises that a combination of effective bargaining, campaigning and good workplace organisation is what recruits new members to PCS. 
 
The figures never tell the whole story, but they don’t lie either, and give us the ability to measure where we are doing well and where to target resources. Much of the technology that has been developed during lockdown has given us new methods of refining our Organising strategies and reaching out to members and reps to develop new and better engagement.
 
Pay Campaign
Members stated clearly in PCS’s recent survey that they are angry over low pay and when surveyed back in May, 87% of those currently in the workplace, still wanted us to campaign for more. 
In February, PCS put in our demand for 10% which reflected the years of poverty pay and stagnation suffered by PCS members. In March, when the Coronavirus crisis hit, we immediately put in our interim demand, as a means to get an above inflation increase to all members in the absence of delegated negotiations. This had been adopted by Scottish government, who paid 3% across the board as an interim payment in advance of pay negotiations after the crisis.
Of course, once again, SP’s Broad Left Network attempted to paint this as a ‘sell out’ where we would settle for a couple of percent instead of campaigning for our demand of 10% – the word interim seemed to be lost on them and when surveyed, members expressed high levels of support for these demands.
 
When the government refused to negotiate over our interim demands on pay, as detailed in the Letter from Lord Agnew, they immediately published their  remit, a measly 1.5-2.5%. Whilst some had predicted a further 1% pay cap, this remit was wholly inadequate, even lower than the award that had just been rejected in Local Government.   
 
The NEC agreed to launch a national petition as a vehicle for building mass support for our pay demands and as a vehicle for organising. It allows us to use high profile campaign methods, alongside local, workplace and work-based organising in branches. It allows us to engage with members and activists, including our new layer of volunteers who have said that they want to get more involved in the campaign, at a time when large swathes of our membership are not in the workplace,. and to build support for a campaign of action later in the year.
The petition is in two stages, the first to get to 10,000 signatures by 30th July to generate a response from government, and then to get to our 100,000 target by 30 October in order to generate a parliamentary debate.
 
Whilst nobody believes that a petition alone will shift government policy on pay, it is clear that the ability to beat the threshold in a later pay ballot will depend on our ability to engage members and secure their buy-in to our campaign and that this methodical work, combining tried and tested organising and campaigning methods with new technology and the ability to engage and secure buy-in at a time when not everyone is in the workplace, and learning from our analysis so far, Left Unity NEC members believe it is our best chance of being able to win a ballot when the time comes.
 
Our opponents in BLN have tried to rubbish this campaign from the outset, using the worst sectarian methods aimed at undermining every debate at the NEC (unsuccessfully) and publishing articles dooming the campaign to failure from the outset, whilst offering little in the way of constructive suggestions, just endless amendments where they seek to ‘out-left’ Left Unity. 
The level of support that they have at the NEC is now pitiful. They have yet to successfully win an argument at the NEC, instead choosing to use the time at the meeting to challenge rulings and delay proceedings with pointless amendments, and then complain when meetings run out of time before all of the business has been taken, as if this is some sort of coincidence.
 
Left Unity NEC members are committed to fighting for fair pay for our members. The same members who have earned the warm words and praise of ministers and the public, must now be rewarded by recognition in their pay packets. 
To dismiss every campaign as doomed to failure from the outset is an abdication of responsibility and really shows our opponents up for what they are.
The petition will be widely publicised and should be live from this week on the gov.uk website. We urge every Left Unity member to campaign amongst members to make it a success.   
 
Tough decisions to make 
Having originally taken the difficult decision three months ago not to go ahead with Annual Delegate Conference in May, and not to go ahead with our annual elections at group and national level due to the Coronavirus crisis, both decisions were to be continually reviewed, and the Senior Officers and then the NEC have agreed that now is the time to review both decisions.
 
Elections   
In March the NEC noted that whilst it was technically possible to go ahead with the national and group elections, we faced an unprecedented situation in which our members’ workplaces and working practices were in a state of extreme disruption. The NEC at the time agreed that no elections should proceed.
On reviewing this, it was considered that the reasons for not going ahead in March had not significantly changed. The pandemic is still dominating the lives of reps and members, and a second wave is now predicted, with lockdown already reintroduced in Leicester.
Knowing that elections would bring with them a degree of campaign activity, and the mixed messages this would send to members and the employer, and knowing that some members would still not be in the workplace, and may therefore not have access to ballot papers (for those with a workplace ballot address) it was decided that, whilst there is always a need to be as democratic as possible, this has to be balanced with the need to prioritise members’ safety.
 
Both Independent Left (IL) and BLN were in favour of going ahead, citing examples of elections that had recently taken place in other unions, but it was pointed out that these were for a three year term in the case of Unite’s Executive Council and for the General Secretary election of Equity, where an election for the post hasn’t taken place for 15 years an election is required as the current incumbent retires in October.  
There is no membership demand for PCS elections to take place now in order for those elected to serve a term of less than 6 months, when the regulations for the 2021 elections would need to be signed off before the results could be announced. It would be a costly and resource-intensive exercise at a time when FTO and reps efforts are correctly focused on dealing with the crisis.
Left Unity members argued that this was not a sensible use of resource and that national elections for 2020 should not be held, this was overwhelmingly carried with IL and BLN voting against the recommendation.
 
Group and National Conferences
 Again, both IL and BLN argued that these should now go ahead, with IL submitting a motion saying that they should take place in October/ November.
The Left Unity majority were in favour of a more nuanced position, and the possibility of some sort of virtual event to take place later in the year should be examined, whether that could be a decision-making conference with all of the issues that entails, and that a report should be brought back to the NEC for decision. This was overwhelmingly carried with IL and BLN voting against.
 
It is still against the law to gather in groups larger than 30, with no indication of when that might change. Venues such as the Brighton Centre are closed until further notice and so only a virtual conference is possible at this stage, and with ADC receiving an average of 600 motions, the way that it could work remotely, either by Zoom or a similar medium, is hard to envisage, not least because of the way Standing Orders would operate, and the ability to engage branches in order to obtain a mandate means that the democracy argument is not straightforward. 
As a comparison, TUC Congress is taking place virtually, not as a delegate conference but as a virtual extended General Council meeting using a system of weighted electronic voting on affiliate union motions.
 
If policy making is the purpose of such an event, there are a number of factors that would need to be considered in terms of their practicability. These included – different types of policy proposals, adequate member involvement for mandating, basis of delegate entitlement, ways of debating, the availability of electronic voting systems, potential for rep participation, equality impact assessments to maximise participation, particularly for our disabled members.  
 
Left Unity members wanted all of the facts in front of them before making a knee-jerk decision being favoured by others that there must be a conference irrespective of all of the other considerations. The recommendation by the General Secretary was overwhelmingly carried.
 
Motions to TUC
We are entitled to submit two motions to the virtual TUC and these were agreed. One on Coronavirus: economic recovery in the public sector and one on Pay: public sector pay campaign. 
The deadline for these is 20 July so they were discussed and agreed at this NEC.  
 
Time constraints and the number of amendments submitted by our opponents to change wording of recommendations in every paper meant that some important business wasn’t heard and will be picked up at the next meeting. 
These included Strategic Objectives and BAME issues/ Black Lives Matter protests. 
A further Left Unity report updating on both issues, with a detailed PCS Black Members report, will be provided after the NEC has met again to discuss these issues.
 
In terms of the Strategic Objectives though, it is worth noting the following:
  • In 2018 the union set itself a target to build the union to reach 200,000 members by the end of 2020 
  • It is now clear that we are not going to meet that target. Membership is currently 177,554.
  • There are a number of reasons for this and the National Organising Committee has been tasked with providing a detailed analysis of the reasons that we have not met these objectives, and reporting to a special NEC in September.
  • This doesn’t mean that we are in crisis, it does mean that we need to look at how PCS operates with the aim of securing a sustainable future and our ability to advance members’ interests. 
  • We also need to look at how we have done things differently during the pandemic and see if there are lessons PCS can learn for the future.
  • We are trying everything possible to return PCS to growth and recent indications are that there are modest signs of growth in some departments.
  • Our recent experience tells us however, that increased organising activity has not been enough to overcome the hostile environment of the UK government and related employers, in order to turn the membership figures around.
  • It would be irresponsible to just carry on as if the difficulties we face do not exist, or just hope to overcome our challenges. We have to take steps to address all of this, and that is why the left-led NEC has already agreed two options to explore further:
  • The first is to radically restructure PCS involving significantly reduced employment costs, inevitably meaning radical changes to the way we do things, a more streamlined, restructured organisation, very different to how PCS looks now.
  • The second option is to merge with another union, we have existing policy to explore merging with Unite dating back from 2014/15, as a means of creating a stronger union force in the public sector. Any merger discussions would need to be based on increasing our industrial strength, taking into account economies of scale, increased resources and our strong, democratic, lay-led traditions.
  • The next NEC will seek to commission scoping papers on both options to be considered at a further meeting in September. These papers would set out processes for considering all possibilities in a transparent democratic way with the widest possible debate and consultation with branches and members.
  • Our BLN opponents have written an article, where they attempt to make this out as somehow underhand, and that they hadn’t realised at the NEC when they heard the financial reports or the organising reports what the implications are. In fact, Left Unity want the widest and fullest consultation possible about the future of PCS and we need Left Unity members to be a part of it.      
There is a lot happening in PCS right now, and we want to keep Left Unity members updated on everything. 
We hope that you have found the updates contained in this report useful and we will continue to update you as issues develop. The Left Unity National Committee are discussing ways of keeping in touch with you all. 
 
Please get in touch if you are reading this but are not currently a Left Unity member. We are the Socialist Group within PCS. Together we are stronger.

We stand for equality for our Trans sisters and brothers

PCS Proud on Twitter: "There's been a lot of coverage about trans ...The Tory government have cynically announced that they have abandoned reform of the Gender Recognition Act. After months of speculation the hope that Trans people would be able to self identify has been quashed.

Currently Trans people are made to go through a lengthy journey, firstly a medical diagnosis must be obtained from one of a handful of the UK’s Gender Identity Clinics, the waiting lists for which can be years long, then there is a wait of two years to legally change their gender and pay a £140 fee. Self-identification would have allowed trans people to change their legal gender after affirming it to a registrar.

Trans people suffer horrific oppression with 75% of the Trans community recorded as suffering hate crime each year. Studies suggest up to 41 percent of trans people have attempted suicide, a dramatically higher figure than for the general population.

In 2019 New Zealand granted asylum to a British Woman on the grounds of the scale of Transphobia in the UK.

The demand for Trans rights connects to the wider struggles for justice and equality. The slogans Trans Lives Matter and Black Trans Lives Matter have been used on demonstrations recently, with 15,000 people demonstrating for Black Trans Lives Matter in Brooklyn after two Black Trans women were murdered within 24 hours of each other recently.

Scrapping the reform of the GRA is part of the drive to the right by the Tory leadership under Johnson. Just as they deny institutional racism exists and mock taking the knee, so Johnson defends using terms like “tank top bum boy” in the same way that he defends referring to Muslim Women who wear the veil as ‘Letterboxes’. As their failure to manage the Coronavirus crisis continues to dent their popularity, so dog whistle racism and homophobia grows.

As socialists and trade unionists we stand for equality for our Trans sisters and brothers and condemn Johnson’s cynical abandonment of their rights.

The Tories want to roll back LGBTQ+ rights and are using the Trans community as a battering ram. During the 1980’s the Tories introduced Section 28 fuelled by the disgusting falsehood that Lesbian and Gay people were a predatory threat to children, now they are capitalising on the myth that Trans rights are a threat to Women’s rights, a myth that has been spun by the right to cause division.

We reject the argument that Trans rights and Women’s Rights are in any way contradictory to each other, this argument creates a bitter divide between oppressed groups and gives the Tories the space to heap further misery on those groups it seeks to marginalise. In order to achieve a society without oppression we must fight for liberation and equality for all.

Socialists and Trade Unions need to support the calls from the Trans community for reform of the GRA and demand that individuals are able to self identify their own gender. Left Unity members call for PCS and other unions to back the campaign for the consultation on GRA reform to be published and implemented.
Marianne Owens

Why must every black British mother have to tell her son how to walk?

This is the text of a speech by Annette Rochester, PCS NEC member, to a Midlands Regional meeting on Zoom in early June.

Today I’m tired. sleepless. Angry. Over 50 years ago Malcolm X said – That is not a chip on my shoulder – that’s your foot on my neck. How prophetic those words were.

Today – Public Health England published a report that I haven’t yet read – delayed by what is going on in America which proves that the government is aware of the social disparity it reveals. they know they need to take the moat out of its own eye and that what is happening in America isn’t because they are unique and could easily happen here.

Already we are seeing uprisings in places like New Zealand and Australia where in just one year – 1991 – 99 Aborigines were killed in custody. In the 28 years since then a further 432 have died. In Britain since records began not one officer has been tried and convicted of murder or manslaughter when people have died in their custody although in that same period 1741 people lost their lives and Black & Asian people are more than two times more likely to die.

Across the West Midlands in the last 3 months there are 6 cases alleging police brutality- 4 involving the same officer.

And of course there is the over-representation of Aborigines, African Americans and Black British people in prison. There is a multitude of reasons for this but anyone who badges this as simply class war needs to understand that we cannot fight a class war whilst we are under siege and fighting for our very survival – our right to breathe.

Every black British mother must tell her son how to walk – how to react to a police stop and search. I’ve told my son and now I’m telling my grandsons. I remember going to a PCS BM conference which was addressed by the then chair of the Black police federation – a detective inspector who told us of the time he was stopped and searched with the old chestnut – you answer the description of a burglar – in his 3-piece suit!

At the same time society refuses to acknowledge the mental strain this puts you under so we often get tagged with the aggressive trope!

It’s not our bodies or minds that are weak but the systems that are supposed to support us. In fact, those systems are often weaponised against us and the recently released Public Health England report highlights it is racism that is the main cause of increased deaths in the communities.

I’m fortunate enough to have lived long enough to have been here before. And unfortunately have seen the same problems that impacted me, impact my son and impacting my 15-year-old grandson who was stopped and search after playing basketball with the same tired old excuse. Why is he not allowed to be a child?

Society is governed by contract – We are policed by agreement. Black and Asians Britons – just when are we going to be allowed to be called Britons? – are expected to sign up to this as part of society but are being short-changed. We cannot put people on the outside of society and expect them to live by its rules.

At work including the civil service we are over monitored and under praised. Our lived experiences doubted and diminished, our opportunities stifled. And rather than seeing fewer race cases they are on the increase.

Some of this is down to lack of empathy and of course downright racism as evidenced in the NHS where it is reported black and Asian medics are pushed to the frontline riskier roles because they are not valued in the same way.

The civil service is promoting the progression of BAME staff – social mobility being one of its top priorities. But all organisations should remember tokenism is not representation – I should not have to say what you want me to say – I want to able to give my truths and for us to work properly together. When all voices are heard we create a rounded sound – a choir.

I would love to see more black activists working with me in the union and in wider society – helping to create a wall of sound and that’s why growing the BM network is one of our priorities. The DWP group has already started on this kicking off with two learning events for all BAME staff in London and West Midlands before lockdown. And we intend to continue this work across the country.

Covid and videos of a state sanctioned murder has opened people’s eyes to the very real injustices and inequality in society. Please keep them open.

You will have heard Lewis Hamilton state he was a lone voice – it’ s horrible being the lone voice – then Charles LeClerc responded saying he wanted to speak out but does not know how to. Then spoke.

I- we – loved that! Please don’t be scared to speak out: White silence is violence. Help us the take that foot off and create not a tolerant society but one in which we can all thrive.

People Before Profit National Coordinating meeting

PCS Left Unity has supported a number of People Before Profit meetings in recent weeks. We are supporting the meeting this Sunday and Fran Heathcote is one of the speakers.
People Before Profit: Health Worker Covid-19 Activists Group:
*National Coordinating meeting*
We are holding a national co-ordinating meeting on Sunday 14 June, 12 noon-1.30pm
The aim is to discuss the battles we face, now and in the near future, to share experiences of organising and resistance during the pandemic and to plan for further action in the days and weeks ahead.
• We have to continue to throw ourselves into the urgent fight over safety at work.
• We also know other battles are emerging.  Mass job losses have already begun – in aviation, in engineering, in retail. And more are threatened.
• And employers and the government will want to make us pay for their failures, with pay freezes and austerity.
👉If you want to attend, please sign up through Eventbrite here, in order to receive Zoom details: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/x/people-before-profit-national-coordinating-meeting-tickets-108163447784
We also invite local Covid action groups, trade union bodies (national, branches, broad lefts etc) and parents groups to co-host the event and to send delegations.

Organising at work in the Covid-19 pandemic

My PCS branch in a non governmental public body and has worked hard over the last ten weeks to ensure our workplaces and staff are safe in this crisis. We felt our senior management was slow to react to the growing crisis and was still waiting on 16 March for government advice. We called an emergency branch committee meeting that day and drew up a list of what we needed from our employer as workers, parents and carers. This included full pay for anyone who wouldn’t be able to work their hours due to childcare and other caring. We included our cleaning colleagues who are outsourced and our agency staff and we recruited some more of them to the union. We immediately wrote to management with our list of needs including that all cleaning or agency colleagues who cannot work during this crisis are paid in full. We said we wanted our offices deep cleaned by properly trained and protected cleaners.

In that first week we called an online members meeting and managed to get over 210 members involved at short notice. The branch committee talked to loads of members by email and phone calls. We called directors again and again and firmly insisted on our requirements for the health and safety of our colleagues whether they are in the union or not. By Friday we had got almost everyone sent to work from home, including staff who had not previously been given tech to work from home. We got assurances that noone with caring responsibilities or health issues would have to be on-call, go to external meetings or anywhere they didn’t feel safe.

In the following two weeks we won ‘care plans’ with time off on full pay for parents and carers who cannot work their full hours. We pushed for the same emergency leave for anyone whose mental health suffers in this crisis but the take up of this has been patchy and anxiety levels are very high. Our senior management talks up our mental health support systems in usual times but staff still report bullying and a lack of support for their mental health and that situation hasn’t been completely solved. The anxiety also affects managers and we have had to try to diffuse situations exacerbated by the lockdown and fear of the virus.

Our online meeting system struggles with more than 200 participants so we repeated our weekly members’ meeting in the morning and afternoon of the same day. Some 300-350 members have joined these meetings weekly and of course there have been arguments and political disagreements but they have kept the committee and members focused and engaged. There are worries about the coming economic crisis and the cuts we may face but we have discussed and agreed we must resist being made to pay for this crisis.

Members’ voted recently to move to fortnightly meetings and we stuck to the plan despite Johnson’s chaos inducing message to stay alert, because our Director General sent a message that our organisation remains in lockdown and working from home. The branch committee continues to meet weekly.

Currently all our offices are closed and two or three individuals go into one office once a week to deal with post. This is on a voluntary basis and anyone else has to get written permission from a director to go into an office. We have been invited onto the working group for the eventual reopening of our offices but it’s moving slowly and it is clear we will be working from home for the foreseeable future.

Many members have been extremely worried at the prospect of sending their children back into schools on 1 June. So we invited Peter Middleman, National Education Union (NEU), NW regional Secretary to our online members’ meeting last week. Over 80 members heard Peter explain the NEU’s campaign to restrict schools to the most vulnerable children and children of key workers until it’s safe to open them further. He answered lots of questions and members said they felt reassured that their instincts to keep their children home was the right thing to do. We shared the NEU petition and template letter for members to write to their MP’s, councillors and head teachers before 28 May when the government is to make another announcement on schools. We encouraged members to join a Covid19 action group, People before Profit meeting this tuesday 26 May for teachers, parents and concerned members of the public. Our branch is clear that we will support any parent who keeps their children home and needs their ‘care plan’ to continue. Our management subsequently announced that care plans will continue for the foreseeable future.

There is still a lot to do. We have to ensure that our offices don’t reopen until our health and safety is assured with proper risk assessments and social distancing . But our buildings are relatively small so most of us will have to work from home for months ahead with all the problems that can cause. We have asked for written assurances that every staff member will be equally safe because we know that black and ethnic minority people have been disproportionately affected by Covid19. So we need to know what measures are going to be in place to ensure that none of our colleagues is at risk. We also want our cleaning colleagues and agency staff directly employed by our employer on the same terms and conditions as the rest of us and we need to work out how we are going to achieve this.

What we have achieved has not been easy, particularly when our HR dept rewrote all sorts of policies and assumed they could be “approved” without proper consultation in the middle of this crisis. But because the members have been so active we have been able to get proper consultation back on track.

Our union branch is stronger, better organised and larger than it was at the beginning of this crisis. So if anything good can come out of this horrible virus it will be that our PCS members have shown an extraordinary tenacity and determination to support each other through the worst time in our working lives that most of us have ever faced.

Organising with other unions during the lockdown

The impact of coronavirus and the lockdown on the way we had become accustomed to organising was incredibly sudden and brought most planned activity to a halt.

A couple of weeks in our Town Committee met on Zoom to discuss how things were going in the different groups and workplaces and to see how we could support each other. At the meeting we agreed to work with other West Midlands unions to find ways to organise and campaign in these new circumstances.

The first meeting had nearly 40 people involved from across the major unions and the following week had 45 people in a public meeting with Fran Heathcote, PCS President, UNISON assistant secretary Roger Mackenzie and others speaking. Now called the West Midlands Coronavirus Action Group – People Before Profit it is one of many similar initiatives that have sprung up across the country. The People Before Profit Health Worker Covid Activists group has helped raise the confidence of health workers to demand and campaign for the PPE they need.

The West Midlands Action Group has been sharing news, raising arguments for PPE and Testing and is now campaigning against an early return to work. We have organised for a small group of socially distanced members to show solidarity with the weekly clap at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham. Around the country similar initiatives are being taken. We are organising virtual meetings, filming interviews and producing propaganda.

Whatever circumstances we find ourselves in we know that our rulers and the Tories will be looking to continue to run society in the interests of profit, and our class will always have to find ways to fight back. We are all probably tired of online meetings, but they have provided a way to continue to organise and build in these restricted times.

Pete Jackson

Birmingham PCS Town Committee convenor

The People Before Profit Health Worker Covid Activists group is holding a “No return to unsafe workplaces” public meeting on Wednesday 6th May at 6pm – click here for details

Unprecedented times – Protect PCS members

PCS, like everyone else is having to get to grips with whole new ways of working. Reps at every level are in a seemingly constant set of negotiations to get the best for the members that we represent, and to keep them safe.

Negotiating to protect our members

At national level, PCS is literally in daily talks with Cabinet Office to engage over coronavirus crisis issues concerning health and safety, terms and conditions and safeguarding issues to keep people safe and maximise the number working from home. Seeking to identify the workers whose attendance in the workplace is critical and maximise safety measures for those workers.

The Cabinet Office say that overall, 80% of the Civil Service are at home, this figure is very different though, in departments like DWP, where as many as 60% of members are required to be in the workplace, all designated ‘key workers’, a term originally used to secure them access to school places, but quickly leapt upon by operations managers to try to ensure that even those who could feasibly work from home, were not allowed to.

We have the Passport Office attempting to start bringing staff back into the workplace to carry out non-essential work, begging the question, how many of us need a new passport processing right now? Having successfully delayed the reopening of two offices whilst proper risk assessment processes took place, PCS has now issued detailed guidance, including legal advice, inviting members to contact a dedicated address individually with any concerns so that they can be given comprehensive advice, tailored to each individual in order to protect them.

PCS has pressed hard on the issue of workplace closures in sites where Covid-19 has been identified, with some successes in HMRC, where PCS was able to close the Salford office, all credits to local reps there, alongside group negotiators, after the initial complacency by management. This has led to an agreed HMRC protocol for workplaces where cases are identified.

In the Border Force at Heathrow, following the death of a member, PCS pressed for proper PPE. When management refused and members started to wear facemasks, astonishingly, they were instructed to remove them due to concern it gave the ‘wrong impression’.

All of this has led to PCS seeking to reach agreement on a protocol for what to do if a case is suspected.

Evidence is starting to become apparent of instances where management did not act quickly, or decisively, enough. In DWP we are seeing more confirmed cases, and offices being closed, because proper procedures were not followed and subsequent time was not allowed, following deep cleaning taking place. The long- awaited testing is being used as a means to getting people back into the office once they have tested negative, rather than being used to ensure the wellbeing of staff.

At a time when the Government advice is ‘Save Lives, Stay at Home’, some departments seem to be panic-running in the opposite direction. The latest correspondence from Cabinet Office dated 24th April indicates though, that they do not foresee any sudden movement of civil servants currently at home coming back into the workplace which is to be welcomed, and negotiators will continue regular dialogue in order to closely monitor this position.

No Going Back

Reps are all grappling with the complex conundrum of keeping our members safe, but also ensuring that we can continue to provide essential services during the pandemic.

One thing is clear and that is that during this national crisis, it is our members and many others across the public sector and the NHS, that have been there to help people, delivering invaluable services to the most vulnerable, paying out from the Job Retention Scheme those workers that have been furloughed, providing the support to keep the country running.

What unites these groups of workers is that they have been under-resourced by successive governments and attacked by the Tories under the guise of Austerity. And whilst it’s great to hear our members praised by celebrities (thanks Pete Andre), we need to ensure that when this is all over that the recognition is not forgotten, that you cannot have everyone banging pots and pans on a Thursday night in recognition of key workers, carers and the NHS, yet continue to support policies that see them privatised, demonised and sold off to the lowest bidder.

None of the warm words will mean anything if government and employers don’t reward them with a pay rise above the rate of inflation and put the same investment into public services and their workforce, as they do into their friends in big business, because we will not forget. It is our job, as trade unionists to ensure that nobody forgets.

The PCS Outsourced Workers Committee agreed the ‘No Going Back’ campaign to ensure that gains made such as sick pay from day one and the civil service agreement to pay workers 100% pay etc must be retained after the COVID pandemic and that ultimately, the best way of achieving this is to bring the work back in-house.

All of this excellent work being done by reps at every level is being appreciated by our members, and interest in PCS is at a real high.

Making Demands

Members will remember that at the end of February PCS wrote to the head of the Civil Service, setting out national demands over pay, pensions and the CSCS.

Then, recognising the crisis that everyone is dealing with, and the need to get every department focusing on what they should be doing, getting as many as possible working from home, but still delivering essential services, often to the neediest in society, PCS set out a number of interim demands, to be implemented centrally, by the Cabinet Office. If government can be run centrally when it suits, with staff interchangeable between departments, this makes future arguments for delegation harder for them to justify.

These were interim demands, and in no way detract from our national demands set out at the end of February, a point acknowledged by the Cabinet Office, which was made abundantly clear in all material.

1. A suspension of the delegated pay process, and an immediate above inflation pay increase for all staff implemented across the civil service from the centre.

2. A 2% reduction in pension contributions.

3. No changes to the CSCS for at least a year.

4. A moratorium on office closures and redundancies.

  1. Any key coronavirus issues not resolved at departmental level, including enhanced health and safety, to be subject to national bargaining.

Most activists and members recognised these as a very positive step forwards, at a time when delegated talks are not taking place, and that if these could be achieved, it would take PCS forward in pursuing our national demands at the appropriate time.

Wrong time to sow division

Only those seeking division attempt to portray this as “parking our key policies and instead put forward watered down demands at this time of crisis.” as stated in this week’s Broad Left Network article entitled ‘Bold Response Required Against Government on the Run’.

Broad Left Network is the Socialist Party electoral front in PCS. At a time the union has been frantically working to protect our members and those in society who rely on the services our members provide, PCS has been churning out materials and briefings. This was the only thing they have published on the BLN website since a call for election nominations in January.

Not a word had been said about Coronavirus or the situation facing members, despite a plea on their website to ‘Follow my blog’. Their slogan ‘Action not Words’ looks a little hollow in light of their lack of activity, and with what little activity they do indulge in limited exclusively to attacking their own union’s democratically decided policies and strategy. It is extremely disappointing that BLN are seeking to spread division during this critical time for our members.

The PCS National Executive Committee overwhelmingly voted to postpone the annual elections to that body in order to prevent unnecessary contact during lockdown and in light of social distancing measures in order to protect the health and safety of activists, members and CWU postal workers.

Incredibly as recently as last week the SP members within the union, including their leader within BLN, have continued to argue there is no good reason why the PCS elections cannot take place, while acknowledging the electioneering that would create.

This, at the very time when casualties from the virus could be at their peak and the impact this would have on PCS members and their families, adjusting to life in their second month of lockdown. It is almost beyond belief that they are prepared to make such comments intended to attack the union’s efforts to protect workers’ health and safety as “anti-democratic”.

Even their own BLN supporters do not support them in this, they were amongst those writing to PCS requesting that the elections be called off at this time. SP are completely out of touch on this issue but see anti-PCS leadership as their priority for factional and electoral purposes.

Socialist Party Scotland ran an article by an SP NEC member from the DWP group, in relation to members at Paisley jobcentre being sent home after national PCS intervention, for which he attempts to take credit. He makes the deceitful statement “Police visited the protest and agreed it should carry on. This undermines the view of some in the union that face-to-face activities should not be carried out during the Covid epidemic”.

No-one in the union has ever said that no face to face activity should take place, but many of us have stressed the point that every efforts to social distance should be made and guidelines carefully observed.

It is telling that this “revolutionary socialist” was prepared to accept the view of the police as more important than the concerns expressed by our own reps and members.

But the motivation behind his baffling comments is explained by the fact that the Socialist Party had, with little or no regard for the health and safety of members who were doing their utmost to practise social distancing, carried out a paper sale outside an office in London, where the casualty rates are amongst the highest in the UK, aimed at collecting signatures to send their factional and electoral material to.

It is worth noting that when branch officers and members complained to PCS and the matter was discussed at the NEC, this same individual hypocritically and dishonestly accused the general secretary and senior officers of ‘politicising things’.

In actual fact the general secretary, supported by senior officers and endorsed by the NEC, responded in a low key manner to the concerns raised by members by writing to SP acting general secretary, a letter aimed principally at securing a commitment from them that the party would not repeat this activity that may endanger members’ health and safety during lockdown.

The response from the SP was a bizarre suggestion that PCS was trying to prevent a socialist organisation, but not the capitalist press, from selling papers.

Their response, in which they still refused to give assurances that they would not repeat the activity, attacked Mark Serwotka and the PCS leadership. When this correspondence was debated at the NEC, it was pointed out by members of Independent Left that this was not a Left Unity decision, but in fact a stance supported by the branch and London regionally committee, many not Left Unity supporters, who had raised the issue.

The acting general secretary of the SP has now replied to say that “clearly there are profoundly different views between us on these vital questions of how the labour and trade union movement should operate in these extremely challenging times which it is in the interests of the movement to discuss out. Consequently we believe it would be useful for the movement for us to publish this correspondence on our website and in the pages of the Socialist.” SP have now published this correspondence.

In their replies the SP give little or no acknowledgement of the concerns of our members and certainly no commitment that their activity would not be repeated.

Keep members safe, Campaign for better

Left Unity welcomes all efforts that are being made by reps and members to stay safe and supports every member who wishes to challenge any situation which they believe puts their safety at risk. We need to keep our members safe, that is after all a key priority for any trade union, but the conundrum is how we continue to deliver services, including those to the most vulnerable, whilst keeping as many members as possible at home.

At a time when our services have never been more vital, when union membership has never been more crucial, let’s do what we have to, to keep members safe. But when this is over, we need to remember, we cannot allow things to go back to the way they were and understand that they have been changed forever.

It is PCS’s priority to ensure health and safety, and whilst sadly we have lost PCS members to Covid19, we will not stand by and allow our members to suffer and will do all that we can to protect them.

The Left Unity leadership supports all members who feel that their safety is being jeopardised and who want to challenge their employer, PCS will back them completely. But, as socialists, we also have a responsibility to keep services running in what is literally, a life and death crisis.

Our members deliver vital services, the media and certain celebrities are currently recognising that, but we need to keep the pressure on Government to reward our members, not just with warm words, but with recognition through our pay, terms and conditions. That is what the PCS leadership must continue to fight for.

Up and down the country, and across PCS Departments and Groups, it is Left Unity members and activists who are leading negotiations and are at the forefront of the campaigning and organising activity that is required to build PCS during these unprecedented times.

If our members are key workers, providing invaluable services, let’s treat them like key workers and reward them accordingly.

Safety first to defend our reps and members

The PCS Left Unity-led NEC met on 26 March and took the difficult decision not to go ahead with this year’s NEC and Group elections in May due to the pandemic crisis unfolding every day before our eyes. We agreed to keep this decision under review, keeping branches fully informed.

Nobody takes a decision like this lightly. We had to give careful consideration to all of the factors. PCS is well-known, across the movement, for being a union that enshrines democracy and we remain proud of our record.

There was overwhelming agreement though, that in the midst of this huge crisis in our workplaces and communities, it would be wrong to just carry on regardless with the inevitable campaign activity that comes with these elections.

PCS reps are working incredibly hard on behalf of members in what is an unprecedented situation, the significant majority view was that to go ahead with these elections would not only be seen as incredibly self-indulgent, at a time when members are so worried for the safety of themselves and their families, but would detract attention from dealing with all of the many urgent issues that arise from the crisis.

The view of the independent scrutineers (CES) was that, whilst it is still technically possible to go ahead and that it would still be possible to post papers out, and then count the returned ones, there is great uncertainty about the period ahead, not least regarding the impact on their own staff and the postal workers, our comrades in CWU.

The Cabinet Office informed us that approximately 76% of civil servants are not currently in the workplace, many working from home. Approximately half a million people have claimed Universal Credit in the last 10 days with over 110,000 trying to sign up in the 48 hours prior to the NEC meeting. The system really is being tested like never before, and continued under-resourcing is being exposed.

Against this backdrop, most NEC members, although not all, agreed that it was the only correct option to take. We had already agreed at our meeting on 19th March not to proceed with our annual conference in May, the period when the virus is expected to peak in the UK, another decision that will be kept under careful review.

Most members would expect, at a time like this, for there to be unanimity on the NEC and the vote was certainly overwhelming, but unfortunately the recently formed Broad Left Network (BLN) faction, argued that ‘there is no good reason for these elections not to go ahead’ at this time, with a longer ballot period (meaning that they would continue throughout the predicted peak in the UK) and with increased electoral activity throughout the extended ballot period.

The BLN argues that democracy is sacrosanct and that nothing should get in the way. This argument was put forward, despite hearing from two fellow NEC members, one who lost a family member last week and another whose granddaughter has been hospitalised.

The arguments put forward, and the lecture on democracy, demonstrated a breathtaking disconnect from reality, and the very real fears most of our members are experiencing, whilst their main concerns are their attempts to practice social distancing and keeping their families safe.

After the BLN proposed amendment, to extend the ballot period but continue with a ballot in May, was resoundingly defeated, the four BLN supporters, and one member of the Independent Left, voted to oppose the recommendation that the elections do not go ahead as planned, and that the situation is kept under review.

Nobody wants to be in this position. Nobody takes any pleasure from everyone’s lives, workplaces and working practices being turned upside down. The coronavirus is dominating the life of every rep and member, and for some this will be a time of sadness and loss.

PCS reps are doing a fantastic job of supporting our members, and interest in PCS is at an all-time high. Our members, many of them designated key workers, are keeping this country afloat and the services that they provide must be recognised, not just in words, but in their pay packets.

PCS is adapting fast to an ever-changing situation because it has to. Being in a union, and experiencing the support that gives, has never been so important.

Senior officers are in almost daily virtual meetings with the Cabinet Office to make demands and get improvements to guidance being issued, both centrally and at a delegated level.

Reps at every level are working flat out to take up members’ concerns and, as a result, are winning practical, and in many cases, longer term benefits for members.

Members recognise that it is PCS that is winning these improvements for them.

We all need to work together, with as much unity as possible, to ensure that PCS members get the support that they need, not be distracted by attempts to paint these difficult decisions as in any way anti-democratic.

We urge all activists, regardless of factional loyalty, to work with us to defend our members’ interests at this unprecedented time. We owe it to our members.